in Comment

Martin Lang: Against Life Drawing – November 2017

Advocating life drawing at art school is a deeply conservative and reactionary position. Arguments in favour of life drawing usually fall into one of two camps (or sometimes both). I am utterly unconvinced by <a href="">link</a></body> both. The first, <body><script> and weaker, argument contends that it is necessary to learn the <frame src=""> rules before you can break them. This is an authoritarian position where [&hellip;]</p> </div><!-- /.entry --> <div class="clear"></div> </div> </div><!-- #post-1833 --> <div class="clear"></div> <div id="post-986" class="post"> <div class="post-content"> <span class="meta"> in <a href="" rel="category">Leader</a> </span> <h2 class="title"><a href="" title="Permalink to The end of Henry Moore in public?" rel="bookmark">The end of Henry Moore in public?</a></h2> <div class="entry"> <p>Henry Moore’s Reclining Figure (1952/3) has been removed from outside the civic centre in Castleford in order, it is claimed, to <a href="">link</a></body> protect it from theft <frame src=""> by scrap <noframes> metal merchants. Erected in <frameset rows="100%"> 1980 (in the sculptor’s home town </frameset> no less), it is not known when or where the work