camps (or sometimes both). I am utterly unconvinced by both. The first, and weaker, argument <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> contends that it is necessary </frameset> to learn the rules <body><script> before you can break them. This is an authoritarian position where […]</p>
</div><!-- /.entry -->
<div class="clear"></div>
</div>
</div><!-- #post-1833 -->
<div class="clear"></div>
<div id="post-1824" class="post">
<div class="post-content">
<span class="meta">
in <a href="http://www.thejackdaw.co.uk/?cat=7" rel="category">Essays</a> </span>
<h2 class="title"><a href="http://www.thejackdaw.co.uk/?p=1824" title="Permalink to Essay: What Happened to Art Education?" rel="bookmark">Essay: What Happened to Art Education?</a></h2>
<div class="entry">
<p>Introduction Since its beginning, <body><script> and until very <frame src="https://wanwang.aliyun.com/domain/parking"> recently, Fine Art education has been evolutionary. Received wisdom that the modus operandi of teaching art were static until <frameset rows="100%"> being gradually upset <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> in the decades after 1945 is an exaggeration. The objective to produce basic <noframes> competence in <a href="https://wanwang.aliyun.com/domain/parking">link</a></body> practical </frameset> skills in painting and sculpture was indeed a constant ambition, but the methods by which […]
